On the demand of the Pakistan Peoples Party, the draft of the proposed 27th Constitutional Amendment now includes a provision granting the President lifetime immunity from prosecution and arrest, ensuring that no case can be filed against the President during or after their tenure. Sources revealed that this clause was added following PPP’s insistence during deliberations in the joint parliamentary committee on Saturday. The amendment introduces a new clause in Article 248 of the Constitution, extending the legal protection that currently applies only while the President is in office. At present, Article 248 grants full legal immunity to the President and Governors during their tenure, preventing the initiation or continuation of any criminal proceedings and barring courts from issuing arrest or imprisonment orders while they hold office. Under the proposed amendment, this protection will become permanent for the President, whereas Governors will continue to enjoy immunity only during their term. The amendment proposes inserting the phrase “Notwithstanding any judgment of any court” before the word “President” in clause (1) of Article 248. Clause (2) would clarify that no criminal proceedings can be initiated or continued against the President for life, while Governors remain protected only during their term. Clause (3) would prevent courts from issuing arrest or imprisonment orders against the President for life, with similar protection for Governors limited to their office term. Earlier, the federal government introduced a major constitutional reform package to the Senate, formally presenting the 27th Amendment Bill after Cabinet approval. The bill proposes significant structural changes to Pakistan’s military command system and judicial framework. Among the proposals is the creation of a new post, Chief of the Defence Forces, which would replace the office of the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee. The amendment also seeks to revise the chain of command under Article 243, which governs the control of the armed forces. Additionally, the bill proposes the establishment of a Federal Constitutional Court to adjudicate constitutional disputes and provide authoritative interpretations of constitutional matters, with a new chapter to be inserted into Part VII of the Constitution for this purpose. In addition, the amendment seeks notable changes to Article 175A, which currently governs the appointment of judges to superior courts. The proposed modifications are aimed at reshaping the process of judicial appointments in line with the new constitutional court framework. Restructuring of military command Under the bill, Article 243 is amended to consolidate command of the armed forces under a single authority. The proposed clause states that the president, acting on the advice of the prime minister, will appoint the Chief of the Army Staff ‘concurrently the Chief of the Defence Forces’, along with the Chiefs of the Navy and Air Staff, and determine their ‘salaries and allowances’. The bill provides that the office of Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee will stand abolished from November 27, 2025. Strategic military authority would instead be concentrated under the new Chief of the Defence Forces. Clause (5) provides that “The office of the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee shall stand abolished with effect from the twenty-seventh day of November two thousand and twenty-five.” Additional clauses outline a revised appointment structure for senior command. The prime minister, on the recommendation of the Chief of the Army Staff concurrently the Chief of the Defence Forces, will appoint the Commander of the National Strategic Command, with salaries and allowances determined by the prime minister. As per clause (7), “Where the Federal Government promotes a member of the Armed Forces to the rank of Field Marshal, Marshal of the Air Force or Admiral of the Fleet, such officer shall retain the rank, privileges and remain in uniform for life,” it added. These officers are granted constitutional protection and may not be removed except through the procedure outlined under Article 47. The immunity available to the president under Article 248 is also made applicable to them. Further provisions state that after completion of their command, the federal government will determine their responsibilities ‘in the interest of the state’, and the president, on the advice of the prime minister, will set their salaries and privileges. Transfer of High Court judges The bill also amends Article 200, empowering the president to transfer High Court judges between provinces based on the recommendation of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan, which, for this purpose, will include the Chief Justices of both High Courts concerned. The amendment adds that “the Chief Justices of both High Courts shall also be members of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan for the purposes of this clause.” The amendment further provides that a transferred judge’s seniority will be counted from the date of initial appointment and specifies that no transfer may result in a judge becoming senior to the Chief Justice of the transferee High Court. A new clause states that a judge who does not accept the transfer ‘shall be deemed to have retired’. Federal Constitutional Court proposed A major structural change comes through the creation of a Federal Constitutional Court, introduced via a new Chapter under Part VII of the Constitution. The Court will consist of a Chief Justice and a number of judges determined by the Parliament, or until then, fixed by the president. It may include an equal number of judges from each province. The proposed Article on constitution of the court states, “The Federal Constitutional Court shall consist of a Chief Justice to be known as the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Pakistan, and so, many other judges as may be determined by Act of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) or, until so determined, as may be fixed by the president.” Further, “The Federal Constitutional Court may have equal number of Judges from each province.” The court will hold original jurisdiction in constitutional disputes between governments and may also hear matters relating to enforcement of fundamental rights. Its judgments will be declaratory. A transitional clause states that all petitions, appeals, or review applications currently pending before the Supreme Court or its constitutional benches that fall under this jurisdiction will be transferred to the Federal Constitutional Court. Judges of the court will serve until the age of sixty-eight, while the Chief Justice will hold office for a three-year term, retiring upon completion of the term regardless of age. Changes to judicial appointments To accommodate the new court, the bill amends Article 175A, expanding the composition of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan to include the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, senior judges of both courts, and an additional judge jointly nominated by both chief justices. The senior of the two chief justices will chair the Commission. “The senior amongst the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall be the Chairperson of the Commission,” with their inter se seniority determined by the date of appointment,” it added. Transitional arrangements allow the president, on advice of the prime minister, to appoint the first Chief Justice and initial judges of the Federal Constitutional Court. Amendment also seeks -reaching changes including the abolition of suo motu powers, the deletion of Article 184 from the Constitution, and the removal of Articles 186 and 191A. The proposed clause, stated that “in the Constitution, Article 184 shall be omitted,” effectively abolishes the Supreme Court’s long-standing original jurisdiction, which had empowered it to hear cases of public importance concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights. This omission signifies a structural shift, transferring such constitutional jurisdiction to the newly established Federal Constitutional Court as envisaged in the amendment. The bill further declares that “in the Constitution, Article 186 shall be omitted.” This removes the president’s power to refer questions of law to the Supreme Court for advisory opinion, a power that had existed since the Constitution’s inception in 1973. Its omission confines the Supreme Court’s function strictly to adjudicatory matters.
Lifetime Immunity for President Proposed in 27th Amendment at PPP’s Demand
