IHC dismisses petitions seeking disqualification of Asif Zardari, Fawad Chaudhry

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday dismissed petitions seeking thee disqualification of former president Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Fawad Chaudhry from the parliament.
This was directed in a detailed written order issued by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah while deciding petitions filed for the disqualification of the two parliamentarians by political rivals.
Justice Minallah took the opportunity to remind how the standard being imposed for elected representatives was not applicable to others who enjoy positions of immense power over the public/
“As a judge, I do not claim supremacy over the elected representatives. The high standard of honest and truthful does not exist for any office holder other than the elected representatives,” he said in his judgment.
He even pointed to the unelected rulers and how they were never subject to the same level of scrutiny even though they ruled the country for around half of its life.
“This measure is not even for the unelected people under whose government half the life of this country has passed,” the judge said.
Justice Minallah further said that disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) has implications for the accused beyond just being ejected from the parliament.
“Disqualification under Article 62 (1)(f) has profound implications. The Parliament can form its own mechanism of self-accountability for the elected representatives,” he mentioned.
Fawad Chaudhry and Asif Ali Zardari were not convicted by any court. Disqualification of both the public representatives has been sought on disputed facts, he said.
“Determining the disputed facts requires investigation. Political opponents of both the representatives will benefit during the investigation,” he remarked.
“If both are declared eligible after the investigation, there will be no compensation for them for the damage they suffered,” he added.
“The courts’ involvement in such investigations undermines public confidence in the elected representatives,” the ruling said.
“The courts getting into these matters also waste the time of the ordinary litigants,” it added.