SJC holds Justice Mazahar Ali Naqvi guilty of ‘misconduct’

The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) has held that former Supreme Court Judge Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi is guilty of misconduct. In a short statement on Thursday, the top judicial body opined that the ex-judge was guilty of misconduct and “should have been removed from the office of Judge”. The Council’s decision stems from a thorough examination of Naqvi’s actions, which were deemed inconsistent with the expected standards of judicial conduct. Following the verdict, the Supreme Judicial Council has recommended the dismissal of Justice Mazahir Naqvi from his position. The Council’s stance reflects its commitment to upholding the principles of justice and maintaining the integrity of the judiciary. The Council has promptly forwarded its opinion to the President, seeking approval for the recommended dismissal. This step indicates the gravity of the findings against Justice Naqvi and emphasizes the Council’s dedication to ensuring accountability within the judiciary. Previously, Justice Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi had taken a bold stance against the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) in an open letter addressed to the Chief Justice and the judges of the Supreme Court. In his letter, Justice Naqvi raised grave concerns about the bias exhibited by the head and members of the Council during proceedings against him. He accused Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Tariq Masood of urging former Chief Justice Umar Atta Bandial to take action against him. He vehemently denied any allegiance beyond the Supreme Court and the people of Pakistan, emphasizing that he refuses to comply with any political agenda. “I am prepared to face the consequences for refusing to bow down to any undue pressure,” Justice Naqvi asserted, expressing his unwavering determination to contest what he perceives as the unjust actions of the SJC. Furthermore, Justice Naqvi highlighted an unprecedented event where the Judicial Council proceeded with actions despite filed petitions, signaling a disregard for the judicial process. He criticized the Council’s issuance of a second show cause notice, citing constitutional and legal flaws, and challenged the competence of Council members due to their alleged bias.